Marvel contends that these characters were created as "work for hire" and that the heirs claims are baseless. What do you think? Is this fair and only a company protecting it's legal property or is the "Mouse" flexing it's legal muscles?
Here's a link to the January 8th NY Times article: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/09/arts/09arts-MARVELSUESFA_BRF.html?scp=1&sq=Kirby%20Heirs&st=cse


No comments:
Post a Comment